The book brings the thought of Julia Kristeva to bear on the challenge of
sexual differentiation in a world that both privileges difference yet
continues to be threatened by otherness. In conversation with feminist
theology and Christian ethics, it explores the role and the ramifications
of being embodied subjects. The book utilizes Kristeva's thought to probe
the roots of violence against women and how violence continues to shape
humanity's psyche. Kristeva's contribution to feminist theology and
Christian ethics emerges through a comparative analysis with leading
feminist theologian Rosemary Radford Ruether. Ruether probes more deeply
than most the pervasive misogyny within the Christian tradition. While
Kristeva exposes the deeply biological (and so determined) roots of
violence against women, her insights provide the needed understanding that
can shift the direction of our thought in addressing the threat of the
other. The book considers how theology (via Ruether) rather than Kristeva
offers the tools to guide us through this opening.
Contents
Acknowledgement
Forward
Introduction
1. The Feminist Theology of Rosemary
Ruether and its Limitation
1. Introduction
2. Ruether's Feminist Theology
2.1 Ruether's Dialectical Methodology
2.2 Three Themes in Ruether's Work
2.2.1 The Image of Woman in the Church
2.2.2 The Nature and Condition of Evil : Implications for Women
2.2.3 Feminist Theological Reconstruction
2.3 Conclusion
3. Kristeva's Insight
4. Conclusion
2. The Trajectory of Kristeva's Thought
1. Introduction
2. Four Stages
2.1 First Stage: The Bulgaria-Paris Transition: 1966 to 1974
2.1.1 La revolution du langage poetique : An Introduction
2.1.2 Mikhail Bakhtin
2.1.3 Roland Barthes
2.1.4 Emile Benveniste
2.1.5 Georges Bataille
2.1.6 Ferdinand de Saussure
2.1.7 Jacques Lacan
2.1.8 Summary
2.2 Second Stage: The China Experience and Kristeva's Shift: 1974 to
1980
2.3 Third Stage: The Speaking Subject and the Human Psyche: Horror,
Love, Melancholy
2.3.1 Powers of Horror
2.3.2 Tales of Love
2.3.3 Black Sun
2.3.4 Summary
2.4 Fourth Stage: "Psychoanalysts in Times of Distress" Dissident and
Stranger; Exile and Healer
2.4.1 Strangers to Ourselves and Nations Without Nationalism
2.4.2 Novelistic Discourse
2.5 Conclusion
3. Critiques of Kristeva's Work
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Bi-polar Reactions
3.3 Moving Beyond the Bi-polar
4. Conclusion
3. Revolution in Poetic Language
1. Introduction
2. Revolution in Poetic Language
2.1 Preliminary Investigations
2.2 The Semiotic and the Symbolic
2.2.1 Kristeva's Expanded Sense of "Text"
2.3 Negativity
2.4 Heterogeneity
2.5 Practice
2.6 Conclusion
4. The Ramifications of Kristeva's
Theory : Abjection and Ethics
1. Introduction
2. Powers of Horror: An Essay in Abjection
2.1 Analytic Theory
2.2 The History of Religions
2.3 Celine's Horror
3. Kristeva's Ethics: Ambiguous and Irreconcilable
3.1 Poetry as a Model for Ethics
3.2 Maternity as a Model for Ethics
3.3 Psychoanalysis as a Model for Ethics
4. Conclusion
5. A Comparative Analysis of Kristeva and Ruether
1. Introduction
2. Synopsis of Key Insights in the Thought of Julia Kristeva
2.1 Otherness, Totalitarianism and the Crisis of the Speaking Subject
2.2 The Body and Language: Kristeva's Dialectical Methodology
2.3 Language as Subversive and the Ethical Function of Practice
2.4 Ramifications of Kristeva's Insights for Feminist Theology and
Christian Ethics
3. Key Concerns and Contributions of Ruether
4. Kristeva's Correctives and Contributions to Ruether
5. Ruether's Correctives and Contributions to Kristeva
Conclusion
Selected Bibliography
Works by Julia Kristeva
Secondary Literature About Kristeva
Related Works
Index of Subjects
Index of Authors
Christine Jamieson teaches Christian Ethics in the Department of
Theological Studies at Concordia University in Montreal, Canada. Her
research draws on the work of Julia Kristeva and Canadian theologian and
philosopher, Bernard Lonergan. Her doctoral work focused on social ethics
and from that basis her research engages in ethical reflection on
challenging 21st century issues such as stem cell research, end of life
issues, genetic technology and values conflict in the healthcare setting.
She is also engaged in interdisciplinary work with a biblical scholar
exploring ethical deliberation in the Bible.
|